Archive - Saturday, 29 November 2008


Never miss anything again. Sign up for our RSS news feeds and Newsletters.

Severn Bridge may not pass VAT cut to drivers

SEVERN Bridge bosses could pocket more than £4 million if they don’t pass on the 2.5 per cent VAT cut to motorists.

NEW PROPOSALS: A feasibility study will look at the options for a Severn Barrage HEAVY TOLL: The second Severn Crossing

A decision not to cut VAT on Severn Bridge tolls would be “highway robbery” and a “disincentive” to come to South Wales, according to politicians calling for the cuts to be passed on.

Severn Bridge Crossings PLC are only “considering” passing on the 2.5 per cent VAT cut from 17.5 per cent to 15 per cent to bridge users.

But they are still set to go ahead with their annual toll rise in January which would see prices for cars go up to £5.50.

On average 75,000 use both bridges to come into Wales every day – more than 2.5 million people every year.

If the VAT cut is brought in by the government for a year, the company would gather £4.1 million.

As yet it has not been decided exactly when the cut will be brought in or for how long.

In 2003 when VAT was introduced, Severn River Crossings didn't raise toll costs and have since made VAT inclusive of toll fare.

Therefore, said a SRC spokesman, the annual increase was based on inflation and had nothing to do with VAT.

But because the company will benefit from the cut, questions are being asked as to why motorists shouldn’t benefit too.

South East Wales AM Mike German said: “I don’t want considerations, I don’t want to see them pocketing the money – it’s scandalous.

“"If the VAT cut is not passed on to Bridge users, then the bottom line will be that Wales is being robbed every single day. It's highway robbery.”

Mr German is writing to the transport minister who he says has the power to stop the toll hike and even reduce it.

Monmouth MP David Davies has echoed the views of Mr German and is also writing to the transport minister to ask for assurances that there will be a reduction.

Blaenau Gwent AM Trish Law says the bridge toll is “already a tax on the motorist” and acts as a “disincentive to businesses looking to relocate to South Wales.”

Newport West AM Rosemary Butler said the decision not to pass on the cut would “go against the spirit of what the government is trying to do.”

“The government is trying to encourage people to spend in order to help the economy, but if organisations like this don’t pass on the cuts in VAT then commercial enterprises all over the world will suffer, including the bridge company,” she said.

An Assembly transport spokesman declined to comment on the story.

  • The Argus is passing on the 2.5 per cent VAT reduction to advertisers.

How the VAT changes would affect tolls

Vehicle Current toll  Proposed increase toll (including
17.5% VAT)
Proposed increase toll (including 15% VAT)  VAT
difference
Car 5.30 5.50 (82p)  5.50 (72p) 10p
Small goods vehicle (less that 3,500 kg)  10.60 11.10
(1.65p) 
11.10 (1.45p)  20p
Heavy goods vehicle (more than 3,500 kg)  15.90 16.60 (2.47p) 16.60 (2.17)  30p

Your Say YourFree Press

Stonebridge, says...
29/11/08

Maybe someone could clarify the situation here. The VAT rate is a legal requirement - you have to charge it and at the correct rate. Do you mean by "not passing it on", the Bridge company will actually increase the toll charge so that the reduction in VAT is cancelled out and we finish up paying the same as before?
The company have no option but to charge the correct VAT rate.
Do they have the legal right to arbitrarily increase the toll? I thought it was strictly controlled by legislation.

micheal johns, risca says...
30/11/08

Right thats it i'm fed up with this
Severn Bridge Crossings PLC they should be kicked out and let the government take over, they are costing wales to much but what can i do ? sod all because we are all dum and we will roll let them tax us even more there should be someone trying change and make a stand as i'll back them .