TOM MALITI NAIROBI Political and ethnic loyalties have long been linked in Kenya. The violence that has erupted since President Mwai Kibaki claimed re-election shows how volatile the mix can be.
The lead-up to last week's vote was typical, with 39% of people interviewed by one polling agency saying they believed voters would base their choice on tribe, and candidates on the campaign trail using a mix of direct and indirect ethnic appeals.
Kibaki's Kikuyu comprise the largest ethnic group in Kenya, and are frequently accused by other tribes of monopolising business and political power.
Kenya has more than 40 tribes, among them the stately, cattle-herding Masai and the Kalenjin of the Rift Valley. In an attempt to force candidates to reach beyond their own tribes, Kenyan lawmakers amended the constitution in 1992 - the year multiparty politics were reintroduced after a long period of one-party rule.
Different provinces tend to be dominated by different tribes, so the amendment was aimed at ensuring a president has some support in most of the country.
Since some tribes are larger than others, a first-past-the-post system would usually mean members of larger tribes would win and not have to seek support of other tribes.
But in 1992, the new opposition parties campaigned primarily in their perceived tribal strongholds. .
That year, tribal clashes fanned by politics killed hundreds and forced hundreds of thousands of people to flee their homes. Many have been unable to return.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article