David Mackay, the chairman of the Scottish Rugby Union, last night warned that Hearts will have to renegotiate any agreement to use Murrayfield next season if they decide to remain at Tynecastle for another season rather than coming to SRU headquarters.
Chris Robinson, the Hearts chief executive, suggested at the weekend it was ''becoming increasingly likely'' that the club would delay moving from their spiritual home for a year.
Murrayfield was always looked on as a stop-gap by Robinson, but it was the lack of plans for a new ground which alienated the Hearts faithful, who were worried they might end up renting Murrayfield on a permanent basis.
The anticipated decision to stay at Tynecastle for one more season may placate supporters in the short-term, but Robinson has made it clear they will be leaving and that a new stadium won't be built on the site.
Mackay indicated yesterday any delay in entering into an agreement over Murrayfield could lead to fresh talks over the rental price. ''Hearts' decision didn't come as any major surprise,'' said Mackay. ''It is certainly a disappointment as we could do with the revenue. We could have provided a positive and mutually beneficial solution. That is still a realistic possibility and is not dead.
''If the proposal is looked at in the future, the rental agreement would also be looked at.''
A Hearts spokesman said no official decision had yet been taken and that all talk was speculation. However, Hearts will at least play their UEFA Cup matches at Murrayfield next season, as their pitch does not meet European criteria.
Dunfermline could also look at playing European ties at the venue if they draw opposition likely to attract a large crowd.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article