April 12.
I refer to the article by Subhash Joshi in which he alleges that
''many smaller traders are being singled out'' for investigation by
Customs and Excise (Business Herald, April 1).
Mr Joshi claims that ''there is a growing tendency for VAT people to
target grocers, restaurants, chip shops, and takeaways for
investigation''. He also questions the fairness of specific methods used
by Customs and Excise investigators, e.g., covert observation in trying
to establish the true level of sales.
Within its allocated resources Customs and Excise has responsibility
to ensure as far as is possible that VAT registered traders of all
descriptions comply with their obligations under the law. Our policy is
to arrange for visits to newly registered traders wherever practicable
within 12 months of registration to ensure they are on the right lines.
We are also fully committed to the principles of the published
Taxpayers' Charter which sets out in simple language the standards to
which our staff are expected to operate, specifically to be impartial
and fair in our dealings with all VAT registered traders. The charter
also clearly sets out the various avenues of complaint and appeal
available.
VAT investigations are instigated for a wide variety of reasons but
often the starting point is an examination of the reasons behind cash
adjustments to annual accounts emanating from professional audit.
Mr Joshi is inclined to be dismissive of first-hand evidence gathered
from observation of premises. In the absence of adequate records this
method is very often the only recourse available to our investigators.
Although it is unrealistic to expect all traders to comply 100% with
the law, those who attempt to cheat the system will, as Mr Joshi
suggests, ''always be discovered''.
The commonly held belief that cheating the taxman is ''fair game''
takes on a different complexion when the consumer realises that it is
his/her money that is being ''siphoned off''.
Iain J. Matheson,
Press Liaison Officer,
Customs and Excise,
21 India Street,
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article