THREE former pupils who hid in trees with an air rifle and fired on Inveralmond Community High School, were fined a total of #1200 at Livingston Sheriff Court, yesterday.
The court was told that pellets narrowly missed a jogger and people walking through the school grounds, and bounced off classroom windows and the windscreen of a delivery van.
Sheriff Francis Crowe told Derek Corbett, 18, James Campbell, 17, and Stephen Clark, 17: ''I would have thought young men would have known the potential dangers of firing an air rifle.
''I am astonished that you did not think about the potential, even from ricochets, if one of these had hit a member of the public in the eye. Very serious consequences could have followed.''
The three hid themselves in trees about 60 yards from the school in Livingston, West Lothian, in June last year, and took it in turn to fire across the playground with the .177 calibre weapon.
The court was told that maths teacher Donald Shaw raced outside to see what was going on after his class was disrupted by pellets striking the windows.
Depute fiscal Emma Knox said: ''People heard what they described as skooshing noises. One person, who was jogging through the school grounds heard a pellet whizzing by him.''
A fourth youngster, a juvenile who was dealt with by the Children's Panel, took aim and hit a man just outside the school. The three older boys then took fright and fled with the rifle.
After Corbett, Campbell and Clark admitted a charge of reckless discharge of a firearm, defence agent for Corbett, Mr Stewart Watt, told the court: ''It was a stupid prank.''
Corbett, of Eagle Brae, was fined #500, Campbell, of Lochbank, was fined #300, and Clark, of Ryebank, all Livingston, was fined #400.
The court also ordered forfeiture of the air rifle, which belonged jointly to Clark and Campbell.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article