THE Olympic Games are going home. Athens, founders of the ancient and modern version of the games, last night won the right to host the 2004 summer Olympics, beating off Rome, the 4-5 favourite, by 66 votes to 41 in the final ballot.
The other cities which dropped out in order were Buenos Aires, Stockholm, and Cape Town.
The voting, in the ballroom of a Lausanne hotel, confounded expectation, but was a triumph for the nimble political footwork of the International Olympic Committee's 77-year-old president, Juan Antonio Samaranch, who is known to have favoured Athens to win last year's centenary games which went instead to Atlanta,
and which proved a disaster.
The odds were against the southern hemisphere, with Sydney the venue in 2000 - another reverse for Samaranch who had preferred Beijing.
Despite impassioned intervention yesterday by the respective presidents of South Africa and Argentina, Nelson Mandela and Carlos Menem, who called on the IOC to favour their country for the first time, the Olympics will return to the city which hosted the first games of the modern era in 1896.
Mandela's charismatic influence accounted for Cape Town's survival in a tie-break vote after finishing bottom equal with Buenos Aires in the first round, but Athens was ahead in each of the five rounds which eliminated the city with the lowest votes.
Stockholm, despite announcing yesterday morning that they had caught the ''lone bomber'' who had sabotaged their bid, was second to be eliminated.
Greeks celebrated and wept in jubilation on the streets of Athens after learning that their country, which gave birth to the Ancient Olympics in 776BC, had had the greatest sporting prize restored to them.
Prime Minister Costas Simitis told reporters that Athens would seek to bring some of the ancient spirit of the games to the present. ''This is a great opportunity to give a new spirit to these games, to avoid commercialism and to restore the noble contest,'' he said.
Yet the Greeks will have to deliver a promised new international #1600m airport and a #1300m subway system, supposed to be operational last year, in order to reduce pollution.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article