MSPs yesterday threatened to use their powers of compulsion against Scottish Enterprise, as they demanded the men in charge of the troubled jobs quango appear before them next week.
In a sign of growing impatience with the economic development agency, Holyrood's enterprise committee rebuffed a request from Jack Perry, its chief executive, to push back the appearance until next month.
Alex Neil, committee convener, said he hoped it would not be necessary to force the agency to co-operate, but hinted darkly: "We do have powers to demand that people and papers come before the committee."
Mr Perry, Sir John Ward, his chairman, and Ian Carmichael, his finance director, had been due to appear on April 25 to explain why they had a GBP30m overspend on their GBP500m budget last year.
The problem has alarmed MSPs who fear jobs and training in their constituencies could now be cut to balance the books.
After agreeing to April 25, the agency then asked for a delay until May 2, after they have finalised their budget for 2006-07 with Nicol Stephen, the enterprise minister.
But the committee rejected the plea, insisting on April 25 as MSPs chose the date precisely because it was before the meeting with Mr Stephen, which they hope to inf luence.
Karen Gillon, Labour MSP for Clydesdale, said: "We have a duty to hold Scottish Enterprise to account. [I want to know] what happened, who knew about it, and what did they do about it. It's not rocket science."
The committee also demanded a report from the agency by the end of the week explaining its financial state.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article