HEROIN addicts could be treated with a painkiller which costs half as much as methadone, scientists said today.
The results of their study could have major implications for treatment programmes for drug users.
The study, the first of its kind, assessed 235 people requiring treatment for opiate dependency in Edinburgh over three-and-a-half years.
The research, by scientists at Edinburgh and Napier universities in Scotland and Adelaide University in Australia, found the prescription painkiller dihydrocodeine was just as effective as methadone in helping drug users kick the habit.
While methadone treatment can cost almost GBP1500 a year per patient, dihydrocodeine costs about GBP713.
It is also covered by less stringent regulations because it is not as toxic and is less likely to cause fatal overdoses.
Dihydrocodeine has been used for years to treat drug users and often is preferred in situations where methadone is seen as hazardous, such as police custody or prison.
However, its effectiveness had never been tested before.
Dr Roy Robertson of Edinburgh University, the study's main author, said: "Heroin addiction is a chronic condition requiring long-term medication. Just as with other chronic conditions, such as diabetes or arthritis, there should be a number of treatments so that doctors and nurses can tailor medication to the needs of each patient.
"Dihydrocodeine offers an alternative for those who can't tolerate methadone, or find it hard to deal with the stigma of having to take their dose - sometimes every day in a pharmacy. It is also cheaper."
The results of the study, funded by the Chief Scientist Office, are published in the current edition of the journal Addiction.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article