THE original files stolen in the Fettesgate incident have been
recovered by detectives in an operation mounted in Edinburgh, though
photocopies may still be circulating.
Police were unable to confirm last night that two men involved with
the Edinburgh gay scene had been detained for questioning.
It is understood that the men, one from Edinburgh and the other from
Dundee, were held under Section 2 of the Criminal Justice (Scotland)
Act, 1980. This allows police to detain a suspect for up to six hours.
Meanwhile, a property factor, Mr Michael Glen, whose home at Gayfield
Place in Edinburgh was raided by police on Tuesday morning, told The
Herald he had been ''set up'' by disgruntled homosexuals.
He said that four police officers had arrived at his premises early in
the morning with a search warrant.
While they were there, he said, ''an envelope came through the letter
box. It was a small brown envelope stuffed full of papers. It was so
full that they were bursting out.
''They were originals from the break-in. The police took them away.''
Last night, however, Lothian and Borders police would not pinpoint
where the documents had been seized, but said they had been found on
Tuesday night in an operation in the Edinburgh area. They were in two
hold-alls.
At a news conference earlier, Sir William Sutherland, the chief
constable, ruled out terrorists or animal rights extremists as the
source of the break-in at his headquarters in East Fettes Avenue last
month. Members of the Animal Liberation Front had been initially
suspected after an ALF slogan was found daubed in the building.
In an emotional voice responding to questions about the effect of the
raid on his force, Sir William said: ''This has knocked us back.'' But
he believed the force would recover. People would see that its overall
objective of providing a good service to the community, efficiently and
effectively, was being met.
The chief constable told the news conference that while a significant
number of the documents had been recovered he could not yet
categorically say everything stolen was back in their possession.
Pressed on the number of files recovered, he said: ''I believe that
all of the files we had listed as stolen have been recovered.''
Sir William said some equipment taken from the offices of the Scottish
Crime Squad and some personal property of officers had also been found.
He stressed that none of the documents related to the security issues
which the force had to deal with and in particular did not apply to the
forthcoming EC Summit, the papers for which were kept under secure
burglar alarm conditions in another part of the building.
He said at no time had the Foreign Office expressed worries about the
force's competence to handle security at the Summit.
The files recovered were operational ones properly kept by the
Scottish Crime Squad. A lot of them related to criminals and criminal
records.
Sir William said: ''It is sensitive. It obviously must be harmful if
files which relate to the way we go about our investigative work fall
into the wrong hands. It must make it more difficult in the future.''
The chief constable said no arrests had been made so far but added
that he was optimistic of clearing up the crime.
He admitted a photo-copying machine had been used by the thieves and
there could be copies of documents circulating.
He said he believed whoever was behind the break-in had a reasonable
appreciation of the building and had put a reasonable amount of time
into the planning of the crime.
Since the investigation into the break-in began around the middle of
last month, a Scotland on Sunday journalist, Mr Ron McKay, has been
charged with reset while a Sun reporter was detained in a separate
operation and questioned for six hours before being released.
Last night after the recovery of the documents the Crown Office in
Edinburgh said the charge of reset against Mr McKay was being
investigated by the procurator-fiscal in Edinburgh who would report to
them in due course.
Meanwhile, Councillor Ross Martin, police board chairman, in a
statement to a meeting of Lothian Regional Council, said the break-in
was a matter of grave concern and would be the subject of a report by
the chief constable to the joint board on August 20.
He gave an assurance that the report of an internal investigation by
Mr Hector Clark, the deputy chief constable, into the break-in would be
made available to all councillors.
Confidence in the chief constable and the force was expressed by both
Councillor Martin and Councillor Donald Gorrie, Liberal Democrat, who
said it was important for the council to demonstrate its accountability
to the electors and to show there was no ''cover up''.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article