A PERCEIVED threat to civil liberties and a deep suspicion of health
board motives were prime factors in yesterday's overwhelming rejection
of fluoridation by Strathclyde councillors.
By 56 votes to 16 councillors rejected requests by the four
Strathclyde health boards to fluoridate public water supplies as a means
of combating the region's apalling dental health record.
Last night Greater Glasgow Health Board condemned the decision as a
retrograde step and one that meant the region would continue languishing
at the bottom of Britain's dental league table.
However, Mrs Kay Allan, campaign secretary for the Anti-Fluoride
Movement, declared: ''I'm delighted and relieved that the councillors
had the sense to see the dangers that are involved in such a project.
I'm relieved that our children have been spared from life-long
absorbtion of this substance into their bodies.''
Ironically the motion in favour of fluoridation was put by Dr Malcolm
Green, chairman of the council's environmental sub-committee, and the
amendment to reject it was presented by Councillor Alex MacLean,
chairman of water and sewerage.
Dr Green urged members to think of the public interest. Health was not
just a private matter. The community had a right to expect basic health
precautions and good dental health was part of that.
He said: ''Our social strategy is in question here. Premature loss of
teeth is greater among disadvantaged people in areas of priority
treatment. What we have here is an argument for social justice.''
Councillor James Gilmour (Conservative), a retired dentist, said the
measure should have been introduced 50 years ago. This would have saved
thousands of children the trauma of tooth extraction.
The crucial issue of civil liberties was championed by Labour
back-bencher Councillor James Mackechnie, who pointed out that community
groups in his area had decisively rejected fluoridation.
He declared: ''I find it quite astonishing that four health boards,
which appear to be repeatedly having difficulties in delivering an
adequate service to the people, have been able to spend this amount of
money on a glossy public relations exercise. Civil liberties are
crucial. They have to be addressed before we consider the medical
arguments.
''You cannot justify compulsory mass medication, which is a practice
alien to a democratic country. I call on the council to reject what is a
really sinister threat to our civil liberties and reject force feeding
with chemicals.''
Liberal Democrat leader Dr Christopher Mason, said the most scaring
thing about the health boards' case was the idea that the poor could
never aspire to a proper level of dental care.
He added: ''Our social strategy should be about empowering people to
make their own decisions. What the health board is saying is, 'Don't
waste your time tackling that difficult question. They'll never learn
how to do it. You can't trust them'.''
Labour Councillor Charles Gordon argued that perceptions were often as
important as fact.
He added: ''While there may be benefits in terms of dental health from
fluoride, clearly public opinion has yet to be convinced. We've got a
responsibility to exercise that doubt in favour of the public.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article