BARONESS Thatcher last night launched another searing attack on the
Maastricht Treaty, and renewed her demand for a referendum.
As the Lords debated the second reading of the Maastricht Bill, Lady
Thatcher said that to refuse a referendum would be a ''disgraceful
betrayal'' of the British people -- and she stated that she would never
have signed the treaty.
She went on: ''I believe that to hand over the people's parliamentary
rights on the scale of the Maastricht Treaty, without the consent of the
people in a referendum, would be to betray the trust they have placed in
us as guardians of the parliamentary institutions and of the courts.''
She won support from former Cabinet Minister Lord Parkinson, who
warned that the treaty was ''a major preparation for trade wars and
protectionism, not a step towards an open system and internationalism''.
But she was openly criticised by Lord Howe, former Chancellor and
Foreign Secretary, who, sitting directly behind her, argued that the
Euro-sceptics had ''moved from practical politics to ideological purism
into a position which now, alas, is approaching deep hostility to the
essence of the Community itself''.
Lady Thatcher said: ''No elector in this country has been able to vote
against Maastricht. It has been impossible to do so. When one looks at
the extent of the powers that are being handed over, it is disgraceful
if we deny them that opportunity.''
She said that fewer than half of all MPs -- 292 out of 650 -- had
actually supported the Bill in the Commons, and warned that Maastricht
centralised power in the hands of Brussels bureaucrats at the expense of
democratic accountability.
The debate continues today, and while the Bill is expected to have a
relatively smooth passage through the Upper House, Lady Thatcher and
others are determined to have their day in court.
The debate was opened by the Government Leader in the Lords, Lord
Wakeham.
He told peers: ''Those who find the arguments (for a referendum)
attractive in this case might, I suggest, inadvertently contribute to
undermining the very system of parliamentary democracy which it is their
professed aim to protect.''
While the Maastricht Treaty was important, there were many other
equally important issues on which the case for a referendum could be
argued -- the death penalty, the role of the Church of England, or even
the role of the House of Lords.
For Labour, Front Bench spokesman Lord Richard accused the Government
of pursuing a ''begrudging and defensive'' strategy on the Bill, which
had eroded Britain's position in Europe.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article