CURRENT events cast their shadows over future engagements sometimes in
the least likely ways. The Ryder Cup match at The Belfry is more than
four months distant, but before this week is over candidates for the
European team to meet the United States will have physically been
measured for the conflict.
The tape measure will be applied to as many as 35 leading
professionals, although the reality is that each side consists of only
12 players. However, PGA officials at Wentworth are not about to
perpetrate the same sin of omission as was made two years ago before the
match at Kiawah Island.
At this same time, on the eve of the Volvo PGA Championship, the 30
players then leading the points table by which nine of the dozen places
are automatically taken had their sizes established for the suits,
blazers and trousers which make up the team uniforms as well as their
on-course wear.
However, Colin Montgomerie and David Gilford were not in the first 30
on the points list 24 months ago and so were not among the players
judged to be realistic candidates.
In the event, both Montgomerie and Gilford qualified for the 1991 side
and had to undergo a late taping and chalking meeting that was too near
to being posthumous to be comfortable for those involved.
The course for the 1995 match has already been settled at Oak Hill, in
Rochester, New York, but the site of the 1997 match has not been decided
-- and may contradict expectations.
Certainly, the match will be held in Spain, but not necessarily, as
some expected, at Valderrama. A location somewhere in the Madrid area
has now gained strength as more probable.
The all-round advantages of holding it near the capital city instead
of on the Mediterranean coast, not to mention Severiano Ballesteros's
influence, surely give Madrid the advantage.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article