The Scottish Professional Rugby Players' Association (SPRA) last night launched a withering attack on the Scottish Rugby Union over their handling of the closure of Border Reivers.
Set up to protect players' interests, the organisation could not represent them as they should at Scottish Rugby Council level because they have been unable to identify a delegate who could sign up to that body's code of conduct.
However, two days after the closure was announced, SPRA officials met Reivers players after which they issued an emotive statement demanding that the governing body's hierarchy - who met Reivers players and staff before making public their decision on Tuesday - visit Netherdale to explain themselves again.
Their main message was that players believe the SRU set them up to fail this season, by giving them insufficient support. The statement also questions the qualifications of board members to pass judgment on the team's future, lack of marketing, and whether every effort was truly made to save the team.
However, players may also be wondering why the SPRA had not been acting on their behalf before and while the review process was taking place, instead of engaging in a dispute over a matter of principle.
Meanwhile, serious efforts to save the team were being driven through Scottish Borders Council. With Bob Carruthers, the main financial backer of Edinburgh's pro team who made a bid to buy the Reivers franchise, in attendance, councillors passed a motion condemning the SRU action.
They also pledged to approach both the Scottish Executive and the International Rugby Board seeking support for a plan to re-establish the team. Again the puzzle is why, when it has been clear since the SRU threatened to axe a team a year ago, this is happening now? The council made noises about supporting the team then, but nothing subsequently happened.
Steve Bates, the Reivers coach whose grim week included attendance at the funeral of the father of a close friend on the day the team were closed, also met his players yesterday, thanking them for their efforts and encouraging them to remain competitive until the end of the season.
He, too, believes more could and should have been done to save the side and that the rugby case for their survival was clear-cut. Indeed, he had not anticipated closure until last week's SRU board meeting, after which the silence from directors made him fear the worst.
However, he admitted to doubts that any bid to save the team would come too late. "Some of our guys have already accepted contracts elsewhere, so any sort of rescue package would have to take that into consideration," he said. "We'd have to move extremely quickly to pull it together."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article